THE SECOND HAND HUMAN CONDITION?

CliffMickelson

Hi Cliff

At http://www.zetatalk.com/index/zeta228.htm it says that the Deep Impact probe was not actually sent to the comet Tempel 1 but rather to the Earth's dark twin. Is there a way that this can be looked at based on observations that have been made available so far?

-John

***

Greetings, John:

I don't know.

Some folks open their egg on the small end and others on the large. The pressing issue for those who crack the egg in the middle is which group to assimilate, re-educate or eradicate first.

In the end, your guess will be as good as mine.

But, since you have opened up Pandora's box, let's have some fun.

In answer to one of your questions, of course there are many ways this question can be looked at. There are likely as many ways to look at it as there are observers.

In the end, we are dealing with the subjective nature of a perceived reality and to some extent it's relativity.

Both are served to us as second hand meals.

Who's word do we take? Do we take NASA's word or the Zeta's?

Here is where we discover that the art of truly successful mind control, (hence "reality" creation) is often a preemptive one.

If nothing else, it is labor intensive and requires a good press agent.

In this context, as in most other similar cases, we are being asked to take someone's "word" for it that something has occurred.

We are often intensely courted in hopes that we will allow the seduction to adopt itself as our personal "reality"

The pre-packaged actualization of this event is based on the consumer credit card of "faith"

To buy on credit is what we are expected to do no matter which party we are persuaded to side with. Either one covets the life blood of interest that is charged.

It is most curious that the endless seduction to win over "faith," seeks to house itself in an edifice we must construct on the perception of persuasive credibility.

Nothing more, nothing less. A bit flimsy for a foundation, but, hey! What the heck!

So the seeming reality of any event "actualization" itself as a "reality" for many of the potential customers being sought is thereby create-able for only those who are willing to submit to its pre-conditioned requirements...

Often this pursuit assumes the nature of a popularity contest; one that on a personal intercourse or exchange between parties, commonly originates out of thin air and validates itself via the same currency.

Kind of reminds me of the way the Federal Reserve functions!

We must all assume on the basis of faith in order to function socially.

Ergo: I assume the sun will rise tomorrow, that certain terrorists did indeed destroy the World Trade center, that you are John and I am Cliff.

However, I am more certain that I am Cliff than I am that you are John, but in the end I am perplexed to truly "prove" either to myself.

You are afflicted similarly. In many cases we both may be more certain of the (so called) factual basis of our assumptions than in others.

If a man says that he is my father, I can prove that he is indeed related if I am willing to do the research. This is the value of science. Yet in the end, it too, falls victim to the relative requirements of faith.

If the Government says that the Tonkin Gulf event did occur and then drafts me because of it, am I now a tool of a lie or the truth?

If the lie is never challenged will it be the truth? And if a lie, will my reality be condemned as the same or will it eventually be redeemed by a superior metaphysical dynamic that will eventually dissolve the unstable elements that form the compounded lie?

Either way, the immediacy of the issue is...I am much less able to personally validate the precepts that I am given second hand and that then place a third party demand upon me that I integrate it as an important part of my reality.

So....

Who sent the probe? NASA or the Zeta's?

Did it land on the comet or on Earth's dark twin?

We must all make that choice if we wish to participate in such a media event and assign it lasting personal significance.

What do you think occurred? And...more importantly, "How" does it really matter to those who are currently disenfranchised from the selling point advertised as the value of the issue.

-CliffMickelson